Consumables & expendables · Spec-Crosswalk

MIL-PRF-6085 Type MIL-PRF-6085

MIL MIL-PRF-6085 · MIL-PRF-6085

Other lines of MIL MIL-PRF-6085

The same document's other types, classes and grades — each its own crosswalk family.

AEROSHELL FLUID 12 SHELL AVIATION LIMITED

CONFIRMED

Qualified to the same specification line (QPL)

QPD_QPL · DLA ASSIST — Qualified Products Database · QPL-6085 2024-12-20 · 2024-12-20

AEROSHELL FLUID 12 LANXESS CORPORATION

CONFIRMED

Qualified to the same specification line (QPL)

QPD_QPL · DLA ASSIST — Qualified Products Database · QPL-6085 2024-12-20 · 2024-12-20

BRAYCO 885 BP LUBRICANTS USA INC

CONFIRMED

Qualified to the same specification line (QPL)

qualified at 2 sites: 4RRP4 · 2H517

QPD_QPL · DLA ASSIST — Qualified Products Database · QPL-6085 2024-12-20 · 2024-12-20

NYCOLUBE 11B NYCO

CONFIRMED

Qualified to the same specification line (QPL)

qualified at 2 sites: F4101 · B6561

QPD_QPL · DLA ASSIST — Qualified Products Database · QPL-6085 2024-12-20 · 2024-12-20

RADCOLUBE 6085 RADCO INDUSTRIES INC

CONFIRMED

Qualified to the same specification line (QPL)

qualified at 2 sites: 6ZS16 · 1RVC4

NSN 9150-00-223-4129 →MINIMUM FLASH POINT AND TEST METHOD: 185.0 CELSIUS CLEVELAND OPEN CUP

QPD_QPL · DLA ASSIST — Qualified Products Database · QPL-6085 2024-12-20 · 2024-12-20

ROYCO 885 LANXESS CORP

CONFIRMED

Qualified to the same specification line (QPL)

qualified at 2 sites: 7YMV4 · 07950

QPD_QPL · DLA ASSIST — Qualified Products Database · QPL-6085 2024-12-20 · 2024-12-20

WINSOR L 245 X LANXESS CORPORATION

CONFIRMED

Qualified to the same specification line (QPL)

QPD_QPL · DLA ASSIST — Qualified Products Database · QPL-6085 2024-12-20 · 2024-12-20

WINSOR L 245 X FUCHS LUBRICANTS CO.

CONFIRMED

Qualified to the same specification line (QPL)

QPD_QPL · DLA ASSIST — Qualified Products Database · QPL-6085 2024-12-20 · 2024-12-20

Watch this family. We’ll alert you when its restriction status changes or a new qualified alternative lands.
Staying inside the regulation — routes from candidate to approved

Codification and qualification say who vouches for a part — they are not installation eligibility. Under EASA Part-21, eligibility flows from the approved design (type design / IPC) or an approved change; under Part-145, acceptance needs an EASA Form 1 or, for genuine standard parts, conformity traceable to the officially recognised standard (145.A.42).

  1. Classify the part. Is it a GENUINE standard part? If the IPC/CMM references only a public specification (AN/MS/NAS/SAE-AS/ISO/EN) with no OEM source-control drawing, buy at source with conformity traceable to that standard.
  2. Check for an approved alternate. The IPC/CMM/vendor list may already carry an alternate part number or vendor code — an already-approved alternate needs no new approval.
  3. Ask the design approval holder. Request the source-control data, written equivalence, or addition of the alternative source to the approved data. Document a refusal.
  4. Raise a design change. Via a Part-21J DOA (or EASA/ADOA): a 21.A.95 minor change adding the alternate to the approved data, backed by an identicality/equivalence file — dimensions, material, class, load rating, lubricant/seal, corrosion protection, acceptance criteria. Critical applications escalate to major change/STC.
  5. FAA-PMA / BASA path. Where the product is also FAA-certificated: PMA parts reach EASA aircraft under the BASA/TIP (non-critical directly; critical via EASA-validated STC).
  6. Production, release, traceability. Approved parts are produced under a POA, released on an EASA Form 1 (marked EPA where applicable), with EN/AS 9120-grade traceability into Part-145/CAMO acceptance.

Stage 1(a): we assemble the equivalence/identicality starter file — the cited evidence this graph holds, shaped for your DOA or compliance department to take forward. See pricing.

Regulatory explainer, not legal advice: paragraph numbers, derogations and the BASA/TIP revision change — verify against the current consolidated Regulation (EU) 748/2012, the EASA Easy Access Rules and the current TIP, and engage your DOA and competent authority early.

This crosswalk identifies candidate equivalents with cited evidence. It is not an airworthiness approval. Substitution decisions remain subject to your organisation’s procurement and engineering approval process and the governing maintenance data (AMM/CMM/SRM/CML/OMAT).